Game report · 2026 Week 9 · FBS · Sat, Oct 31, 2:00 PM CT

TEM @ ECU

Week 9 reports › FBS

Temple9

FINAL

East Carolina

Final9–17TEM at ECU

B1G+A pregame70%ECU win chance at kickoff

4th-down decisions1414 graded · 11 matched the higher-WP option

Plays tracked132from public play-by-play feeds

B1G+A WIN PROBABILITY · WHOLE GAME

Final

▲ ECU win chance▼ TEM

Red racing arrow: B1G+A Live Tracker (Beta) win probability after every play, whole game. Black dots: every 4th-down decision by the coaches (hover or tap for the call). Open rings: the 5 biggest swing plays. Green number: team favored now. Red number: the other team. Faint dashed line: public-feed win probability, for comparison.

4TH DOWNS & COACHING DECISIONS

14 4th downs · 14 graded · 11 matched · 4 go

Every 4th-down snap for both teams. Win chances (WP) are the offense's B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability for each option at the snap: go (conversion chance × WP if converted, plus WP after a turnover on downs), field goal and punt. Options within 1 WP point are toss-ups. Fakes count as go. Bad snaps (the feed logs a team rush) are not graded. Shaded rows differ from the higher-WP option.

Team	Qtr	Clock	Score (off-def)	Field position	Yds to goal	To go	Call	Result	Go WP	FG WP	Punt WP	Verdict	Call vs higher-WP option (WP pts)
TEM	Q1	12:03	0-0	TEM 43	57	7	Punt	Punt 40 yds, fair catch	27.6% (34% conv)	—	27.3%	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	−0.4
ECU	Q1	10:55	0-0	ECU 16	84	2	Punt	Punt 55 yds, out of bounds	64.2% (57% conv)	—	62.0%	Higher-WP option: Go	−2.2
TEM	Q1	7:24	0-0	ECU 23	23	10	FG	FG missed	33.9% (28% conv)	35.8%	—	Right call	0.0
ECU	Q1	3:52	0-0	TEM 20	20	1	Go	Converted (1 yds)	75.8% (69% conv)	72.0%	—	Right call	0.0
TEM	Q2	14:21	0-7	TEM 34	66	3	Punt	Punt 41 yds, fair catch	13.0% (50% conv)	—	11.4%	Higher-WP option: Go	−1.6
ECU	Q2	9:21	7-0	TEM 15	15	5	Go	Turnover on downs	88.4% (40% conv)	88.9%	—	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	−0.5
TEM	Q2	2:52	0-7	ECU 23	23	14	FG	FG good	17.1% (23% conv)	18.3%	—	Right call	0.0
ECU	Q2	0:10	7-3	TEM 2	2	2	FG	FG good	83.9% (47% conv)	82.2%	—	Higher-WP option: Go	−1.7
TEM	Q3	5:08	3-17	ECU 28	28	15	FG	FG good	5.3% (23% conv)	5.8%	—	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	0.0
ECU	Q3	2:13	17-6	TEM 41	41	3	Go	Turnover on downs	92.6% (50% conv)	91.3%	92.9%	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	−0.3
ECU	Q3	0:07	17-6	50	50	7	Punt	Punt 41 yds	90.9% (34% conv)	—	92.5%	Right call	0.0
TEM	Q4	10:12	6-17	ECU 23	23	7	FG	FG good	10.1% (34% conv)	10.1%	—	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	0.0
ECU	Q4	6:52	17-9	ECU 36	64	6	Punt	Punt 37 yds, out of bounds	78.4% (37% conv)	—	83.6%	Right call	0.0
ECU	Q4	1:54	17-9	TEM 26	26	1	Go	Converted (5 yds)	98.2% (69% conv)	98.3%	—	Toss-up (within 1 pt)	−0.1

2 4th-down snaps wiped out by penalty (no play) left out.

Two-point tries

No two-point tries in this game.

Clock management · final 2:00 of each half

End of 1st half

Score at 2:00 TEM 3–7 ECU; at the end TEM 3–10 ECU. Snaps: TEM 1, ECU 6.

Offense	First snap in window	Snaps in window	Drive result
ECU	1:49	6	Field Goal
TEM	0:06	1	End of Half

End of game (last 2:00 of regulation)

Score at 2:00 TEM 9–17 ECU; at the end TEM 9–17 ECU. Snaps: TEM 0, ECU 3.

Offense	First snap in window	Snaps in window	Drive result
ECU	1:54	3	End of Game

Replay reviews & challenges

Qtr	Clock	Review
Q1	4:19	Review: upheld
Q1	1:53	Review: upheld
Q1	1:19	Review: upheld
Q1	1:17	Review: overturned
Q3	14:00	Review: upheld
Q3	11:26	Review: upheld
Q4	8:06	Review: overturned

From public play-by-play feeds and the B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability. Penalty-negated snaps are left out.

Built from public play-by-play feeds replayed through the B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability. Every number here is B1G+A. Report data (JSON) · Full box score →