⚠ MAINTENANCE NOTICE: Update, Nov. 4: We're in the final stretch. Our model and data upgrades are being finalized and checked now, and updated rankings and reports will return shortly. Thanks for your patience. LIVE CFB ANALYTICS. PLAY BY PLAY. Click to read the full notice →NEW: Three-row live ticker + live in-game analytics for every CFB game → B1G+A Live Tracker (Beta)
B1G
TOP 25
CFB
B1G+ Analytics
LIVE CFB ANALYTICS. PLAY BY PLAY.
B1G+ Analytics@B1GAnalytics
ABAALL BIG ANALYTICSCFB DATA HUB · POWERED BY THE B1G+A MODEL
Built by All BIG Analytics

Game report · 2026 Week 9 · FBS · Sat, Oct 31, 2:30 PM CT

USM @ ULM

Week 9 reports › FBS

Southern Miss35
FINAL
21UL Monroe
Final35–21USM at ULM
B1G+A pregame30%ULM win chance at kickoff
4th-down decisions2121 graded · 18 matched the higher-WP option
Plays tracked164from public play-by-play feeds

B1G+A WIN PROBABILITY · WHOLE GAME

Final
Q2Q3Q4USM 4th down Q1 6:21: went for itULM 4th down Q1 4:49: puntedUSM 4th down Q1 4:03: puntedULM 4th down Q1 1:53: puntedUSM 4th down Q1 0:05: went for itUSM 4th down Q2 12:48: went for itULM 4th down Q2 8:45: kicked the field goalUSM 4th down Q2 6:51: puntedULM 4th down Q2 2:37: puntedUSM 4th down Q2 1:00: puntedUSM 4th down Q2 0:17: kicked the field goalUSM 4th down Q3 13:26: puntedULM 4th down Q3 9:33: puntedUSM 4th down Q3 7:09: puntedULM 4th down Q3 4:43: puntedULM 4th down Q3 3:00: went for itUSM 4th down Q3 0:38: kicked the field goalUSM 4th down Q4 10:05: puntedUSM 4th down Q4 3:44: puntedULM 4th down Q4 2:25: went for itULM 4th down Q4 0:53: went for itULM 0.0%USM 100.0%
▲ ULM win chance▼ USM

Red racing arrow: B1G+A Live Tracker (Beta) win probability after every play, whole game. Black dots: every 4th-down decision by the coaches (hover or tap for the call). Open rings: the 5 biggest swing plays. Green number: team favored now. Red number: the other team. Faint dashed line: public-feed win probability, for comparison.

4TH DOWNS & COACHING DECISIONS

21 4th downs · 21 graded · 18 matched · 6 go

Every 4th-down snap for both teams. Win chances (WP) are the offense's B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability for each option at the snap: go (conversion chance × WP if converted, plus WP after a turnover on downs), field goal and punt. Options within 1 WP point are toss-ups. Fakes count as go. Bad snaps (the feed logs a team rush) are not graded. Shaded rows differ from the higher-WP option.

TeamQtrClockScore (off-def)Field positionYds to goalTo goCallResultGo WPFG WPPunt WPVerdictCall vs higher-WP option (WP pts)
USMQ16:210-0ULM 37374GoTurnover on downs68.5% (44% conv)66.7%67.4%Right call0.0
ULMQ14:490-0ULM 44563PuntPunt 45 yds, fair catch33.4% (50% conv)—30.5%Higher-WP option: Go−2.8
USMQ14:030-0USM 118910PuntPunt 54 yds54.0% (28% conv)—57.6%Right call0.0
ULMQ11:530-0ULM 43572PuntPunt 43 yds, fair catch35.5% (57% conv)—31.4%Higher-WP option: Go−4.1
USMQ10:050-0USM 36641GoConverted (6 yds)65.9% (69% conv)—60.7%Right call0.0
USMQ212:480-0ULM 33332GoConverted (TD)69.1% (57% conv)65.8%—Right call0.0
ULMQ28:450-7USM 24249FGFG missed16.9% (30% conv)17.6%—Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
USMQ26:517-0USM 198115PuntPunt 47 yds, fair catch76.8% (23% conv)—80.8%Right call0.0
ULMQ22:370-7ULM 435714PuntPunt 40 yds, fair catch12.6% (23% conv)—13.4%Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
USMQ21:007-0USM 316910PuntPunt 44 yds, returned78.9% (28% conv)—82.0%Right call0.0
USMQ20:177-0ULM 18184FGFG good87.8% (44% conv)88.3%—Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
USMQ313:2610-0USM 48528PuntPunt 35 yds88.7% (32% conv)—90.1%Right call0.0
ULMQ39:337-17ULM 41594PuntPunt 46 yds, returned9.1% (44% conv)—8.2%Toss-up (within 1 pt)−0.8
USMQ37:0917-7ULM 45455PuntPunt 31 yds, fair catch89.8% (40% conv)88.0%90.7%Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
ULMQ34:437-17ULM 59529PuntPunt 48 yds, returned4.8% (15% conv)—6.0%Right call0.0
ULMQ33:007-24ULM 32683GoTurnover on downs2.2% (50% conv)—1.9%Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
USMQ30:3824-7ULM 21218FGFG good98.2% (32% conv)98.5%—Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0
USMQ410:0527-14USM 29716PuntPunt 48 yds, fair catch93.5% (37% conv)—95.2%Right call0.0
USMQ43:4427-21USM 47533PuntPunt 35 yds, fair catch86.5% (50% conv)—83.1%Higher-WP option: Go−3.4
ULMQ42:2521-27ULM 36646GoTurnover on downs9.5% (37% conv)—0.5%Right call0.0
ULMQ40:5321-35ULM 27738GoTurnover on downs0.5% (32% conv)—0.5%Toss-up (within 1 pt)0.0

Two-point tries

TeamQtrClockPlayScore after (team-opp)
USMQ41:52Pass, Good35-21

Clock management · final 2:00 of each half

End of 1st half

Score at 2:00 USM 7–0 ULM; at the end USM 10–0 ULM. Snaps: USM 10, ULM 1.

OffenseFirst snap in windowSnaps in windowDrive result
USM1:546Fumble
USM0:554Field Goal
ULM0:171End of Half

End of game (last 2:00 of regulation)

Score at 2:00 USM 27–21 ULM; at the end USM 35–21 ULM. Snaps: USM 4, ULM 4.

OffenseFirst snap in windowSnaps in windowDrive result
USM1:521Touchdown
ULM1:384Downs
USM0:463End of Game

Replay reviews & challenges

QtrClockReview
Q313:45Review: upheld
Q33:06Review: upheld

From public play-by-play feeds and the B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability. Penalty-negated snaps are left out.

Built from public play-by-play feeds replayed through the B1G+A Model 2.2 win probability. Every number here is B1G+A. Report data (JSON) · Full box score →

@B1GAnalytics
SEASON STATS · STANDINGS · PROJECTIONSFOLLOW FOR EVERY B1G MATCHUP
Follow on X@B1GAnalytics