Ratings
B1G+A POWER RANKINGS
Every FBS team, ranked by the B1G+A model: the B1G+A rating (a weighted blend of FPI (comparison) and the B1G+A Power Rating) plus record, strength of record, quality wins and head-to-head results.
Refit Oct 18, 2:45 PM CT from 510 completed 2026 games · this week: 65% FPI (comparison) + 35% B1G+A Power Rating · FPI (comparison) (public feeds updated 2026-10-18T08:00Z)
B1G+A B1G POWER RANKINGS
Week 7 · all 18 Big Ten teams · card (PNG)Power rtg = the pure B1G+A Power Rating (game results + box-score efficiency only), same scale. Rank also counts résumé and head-to-head, so a higher rating can rank lower.
Data note = one standout fact about the team: its best FBS offense/defense rank, a head-to-head or quality win, or its B1G+A rating rank.
| Rk | Team | Rec | B1G+A rating (pts vs avg FBS team) | Power rtg | CFP odds | Data note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Indiana | 6-0 | +24.324.3 pts better than an average FBS team | +21.6 | 90.6% | No. 1 defense in FBS |
| 2 |  Ohio State | 5-1 | +26.926.9 pts better than an average FBS team | +23.8 | 76.0% | Top-5 offense and defense |
| 3 |  UCLA | 5-0 | +11.511.5 pts better than an average FBS team | +14.3 | 32.1% | Head-to-head win over Oregon |
| 4 |  Oregon | 3-2 | +17.717.7 pts better than an average FBS team | +13.4 | 9.1% | Beat B1G+A top-25 USC |
| 5 |  Nebraska | 5-1 | +15.415.4 pts better than an average FBS team | +10.6 | 20.0% | No. 20 offense in FBS |
| 6 |  USC | 6-1 | +13.113.1 pts better than an average FBS team | +9.7 | 13.8% | No. 14 offense in FBS |
| 7 |  Iowa | 5-1 | +12.312.3 pts better than an average FBS team | +10.6 | 19.9% | No. 12 defense in FBS |
| 8 |  Northwestern | 4-1 | +12.812.8 pts better than an average FBS team | +9.9 | 11.9% | Best unit: No. 31 offense |
| 9 |  Wisconsin | 4-1 | +9.79.7 pts better than an average FBS team | +8.4 | 10.1% | No. 22 defense in FBS |
| 10 |  Purdue | 3-3 | +3.03.0 pts better than an average FBS team | +2.2 | 0.0% | Head-to-head win over Minnesota |
| 11 |  Minnesota | 4-2 | −0.20.2 pts worse than an average FBS team | −1.4 | 0.0% | Head-to-head win over Michigan |
| 12 |  Michigan | 3-2 | +9.79.7 pts better than an average FBS team | +6.9 | 0.3% | Beat B1G+A top-25 Oklahoma |
| 13 |  Penn State | 3-3 | +10.810.8 pts better than an average FBS team | +6.9 | 0.0% | Best unit: No. 28 defense |
| 14 |  Illinois | 3-3 | +4.14.1 pts better than an average FBS team | +3.3 | 0.0% | Best unit: No. 36 offense |
| 15 |  Washington | 3-3 | +2.82.8 pts better than an average FBS team | +1.2 | 0.0% | B1G+A rating No. 58 in FBS |
| 16 |  Michigan St | 2-4 | +0.50.5 pts better than an average FBS team | −1.5 | 0.0% | Best unit: No. 44 defense |
| 17 |  Maryland | 2-4 | −2.02.0 pts worse than an average FBS team | −1.0 | 0.0% | B1G+A rating No. 77 in FBS |
| 18 |  Rutgers | 1-4 | −5.95.9 pts worse than an average FBS team | −8.1 | 0.0% | B1G+A rating No. 93 in FBS |
Based on results, efficiency and résumé: B1G+A ranking = B1G+A rating + résumé (record vs. schedule, quality wins), then head-to-head (if A beat B, A ranks ahead unless it is a split series or part of a results cycle). B1G+A RTG = 70% FPI (comparison) + 30% B1G+A Power Rating; POWER RTG = pure B1G+A Power Rating (game results + box-score efficiency), both in points vs. an average FBS team. CFP ODDS = B1G+A start-of-day playoff % (FPI (comparison) playoff % blended with a 40,000-run B1G+A sim). Notes: offense/defense ranks among FBS from the B1G+A Power Rating split; top-25 = B1G+A rating top 25. Week-over-week change: not available (this is the first archived B1G+A B1G power ranking; change appears from next week). Not affiliated with the Big Ten Conference.
ALL FBS: B1G+A POWER RANKINGS
138 teams · how it worksRank = B1G+A rating + résumé (record, quality wins), then head-to-head. The rating columns show pure team strength.
| Rk | Team | Rec | B1G+A rating | Résumé | Power rtg | FPI (comparison) | Off | Def | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio StateOSU | 6-1 | +26.7 #1 | +7.0 #4 | +23.8 #1 | +28.2 #1 | +12.4 #5 | +11.4 #2 | |
| 2 |  MiamiMIA | 6-0 | +25.0 #3 | +5.9 #9 | +22.3 #3 | +26.5 #4 | +14.4 #1 | +7.8 #10 | |
| 3 | IndianaIU | 6-1 | +24.1 #5 | +6.3 #7 | +21.8 #4 | +25.4 #5 | +8.4 #13 | +13.4 #1 | |
| 4 |  GeorgiaUGA | 6-1 | +24.6 #4 | +5.8 #10 | +20.6 #6 | +26.7 #3 | +13.1 #3 | +7.5 #11 | |
| 5 |  Notre DameND | 6-1 | +26.0 #2 | +3.8 #16 | +22.6 #2 | +27.9 #2 | +13.1 #2 | +9.5 #5 | |
| 6 |  AlabamaALA | 5-2 | +23.1 #6 | +4.2 #14 | +21.1 #5 | +24.2 #6 | +12.9 #4 | +8.3 #8 | |
| 7 |  Ole MissMISS | 5-1 | +17.8 #9 | +7.7 #2 | +16.0 #9 | +18.8 #11 | +10.1 #7 | +5.9 #22 | |
| 8 |  TexasTEX | 4-2 | +21.1 #7 | +4.4 #13 | +16.5 #8 | +23.6 #7 | +5.8 #26 | +10.7 #3 | |
| 9 |  BYUBYU | 6-0 | +16.8 #12 | +7.1 #3 | +15.8 #10 | +17.4 #14 | +5.8 #25 | +10.0 #4 | |
| 10 |  TennesseeTENN | 6-1 | +16.6 #13 | +6.6 #5 | +13.9 #14 | +18.1 #12 | +6.0 #24 | +8.0 #9 | |
| 11 |  Texas TechTTU | 6-0 | +17.6 #10 | +5.3 #11 | +14.1 #13 | +19.4 #9 | +7.6 #14 | +6.5 #20 | |
| 12 |  LSULSU | 5-2 | +21.1 #8 | +1.5 #30 | +17.5 #7 | +23.0 #8 | +10.0 #8 | +7.4 #12 | |
| 13 | OregonORE | 4-2 | +16.9 #11 | +3.2 #19 | +13.0 #16 | +19.0 #10 | +6.0 #23 | +7.0 #16 | |
| 14 |  Wake ForestWAKE | 6-1 | +15.0 #15 | +4.8 #12 | +14.4 #11 | +15.4 #16 | +7.4 #15 | +7.0 #17 | |
| 15 |  UtahUTAH | 6-0 | +16.3 #14 | +3.6 #17 | +14.1 #12 | +17.4 #13 | +9.1 #12 | +5.0 #28 | |
| 16 |  KentuckyUK | 6-1 | +11.2 #26 | +8.6 #1 | +8.4 #28 | +12.7 #26 | +5.7 #27 | +2.7 #44 | |
| 17 |  Mississippi StMSST | 4-2 | +8.3 #40 | +3.4 #18 | +6.9 #34 | +9.1 #38 | +6.2 #22 | +0.8 #63 | beat MIZ |
| 18 |  MissouriMIZ | 5-2 | +11.8 #23 | +2.6 #23 | +10.9 #22 | +12.3 #27 | +3.8 #42 | +7.1 #15 | beat FLA |
| 19 |  FloridaFLA | 5-2 | +12.2 #20 | +6.2 #8 | +8.4 #27 | +14.3 #19 | +9.6 #10 | -1.2 #77 | |
| 20 |  HoustonHOU | 6-1 | +13.5 #17 | +4.0 #15 | +11.1 #19 | +14.8 #18 | +7.2 #16 | +3.9 #37 | |
| 21 | USCUSC | 6-1 | +13.3 #18 | +2.9 #22 | +10.3 #24 | +14.9 #17 | +9.3 #11 | +0.9 #58 | |
| 22 | UCLAUCLA | 6-0 | +9.0 #34 | +6.3 #6 | +13.7 #15 | +11.0 #31 | +6.3 #21 | +7.4 #13 | |
| 23 | IowaIOWA | 5-1 | +12.2 #21 | +3.0 #21 | +10.5 #23 | +13.1 #25 | +3.2 #46 | +7.3 #14 | |
| 24 | NebraskaNEB | 5-2 | +15.0 #16 | +0.2 #36 | +11.1 #21 | +17.1 #15 | +5.4 #29 | +5.7 #24 | |
| 25 |  AuburnAUB | 4-2 | +11.8 #24 | +3.0 #20 | +8.7 #26 | +13.4 #21 | +2.2 #51 | +6.5 #21 | |
| 26 | NorthwesternNU | 5-1 | +11.9 #22 | +2.3 #25 | +9.6 #25 | +13.1 #24 | +4.8 #34 | +4.8 #33 | |
| 27 | MichiganMICH | 4-2 | +9.4 #31 | +0.1 #37 | +6.5 #37 | +10.9 #32 | -0.3 #71 | +6.8 #18 | beat OU |
| 28 |  OklahomaOU | 3-3 | +11.2 #25 | +0.6 #34 | +7.4 #32 | +13.3 #22 | -0.9 #75 | +8.3 #7 | |
| 29 |  ArizonaARIZ | 5-1 | +10.7 #28 | +1.1 #31 | +11.1 #20 | +10.5 #33 | +5.6 #28 | +5.5 #25 | |
| 30 |  LouisvilleLOU | 4-3 | +13.1 #19 | -1.5 #47 | +12.6 #17 | +13.3 #23 | +10.7 #6 | +1.9 #51 | |
| 31 |  James MadisonJMU | 7-0 | +8.5 #39 | +2.5 #24 | +11.2 #18 | +7.0 #46 | +7.0 #19 | +4.3 #36 | |
| 32 |  Boise StBOIS | 5-1 | +9.1 #32 | +1.7 #28 | +4.9 #47 | +11.4 #30 | +5.2 #30 | -0.3 #69 | |
| 33 |  SMUSMU | 5-1 | +9.1 #33 | +1.7 #27 | +7.7 #31 | +9.8 #35 | +4.4 #37 | +3.3 #40 | |
| 34 |  ClemsonCLEM | 4-2 | +5.3 #49 | +0.7 #33 | +3.0 #55 | +6.5 #48 | -1.9 #81 | +4.9 #30 | beat UNC |
| 35 |  North CarolinaUNC | 4-2 | +7.6 #43 | +1.8 #26 | +5.7 #45 | +8.7 #41 | +0.2 #68 | +5.5 #27 | |
| 36 | WisconsinWIS | 4-2 | +8.6 #36 | +0.4 #35 | +7.8 #30 | +9.0 #39 | +1.2 #59 | +6.6 #19 | |
| 37 |  Oklahoma StOKST | 4-2 | +7.9 #42 | +0.9 #32 | +6.0 #43 | +9.0 #40 | +5.1 #31 | +0.8 #59 | |
| 38 |  South CarolinaSC | 3-3 | +10.0 #29 | -1.3 #43 | +7.0 #33 | +11.6 #29 | +6.3 #20 | +0.6 #64 | |
| 39 |  Texas A&MTA&M | 4-3 | +10.8 #27 | -2.3 #55 | +5.9 #44 | +13.5 #20 | +0.1 #69 | +5.8 #23 | |
| 40 |  PittPITT | 5-2 | +8.1 #41 | -1.5 #46 | +6.0 #42 | +9.2 #37 | +2.2 #50 | +3.8 #38 | |
| 41 |  UCFUCF | 3-3 | +4.9 #50 | -2.7 #62 | +4.4 #49 | +5.2 #51 | +1.6 #55 | +2.8 #43 | beat TCU |
| 42 |  TCUTCU | 3-3 | +8.5 #38 | -3.0 #69 | +8.3 #29 | +8.6 #42 | -1.1 #76 | +9.4 #6 | beat BAY |
| 43 |  BaylorBAY | 4-2 | +8.7 #35 | -1.7 #49 | +6.2 #40 | +10.0 #34 | +0.7 #63 | +5.5 #26 | |
| 44 |  New MexicoUNM | 5-1 | +6.7 #46 | -0.4 #38 | +4.5 #48 | +7.8 #43 | +2.3 #49 | +2.2 #47 | |
| 45 |  Florida StFSU | 3-4 | +8.5 #37 | -3.0 #68 | +6.6 #35 | +9.6 #36 | +5.0 #32 | +1.5 #56 | |
| 46 |  DukeDUKE | 4-2 | +7.2 #44 | -2.2 #52 | +6.2 #41 | +7.8 #44 | +1.7 #54 | +4.5 #34 | |
| 47 |  Oregon StORST | 5-2 | +6.1 #47 | -1.4 #45 | +6.3 #39 | +6.0 #49 | +7.0 #18 | -0.6 #72 | |
| 48 |  CincinnatiCIN | 4-2 | +2.7 #58 | -1.9 #50 | +1.2 #62 | +3.5 #56 | +3.7 #43 | -2.5 #91 | beat KSU |
| 49 |  Kansas StKSU | 4-2 | +6.7 #45 | -2.0 #51 | +5.1 #46 | +7.6 #45 | +3.3 #45 | +1.8 #52 | |
| 50 | Penn StatePSU | 3-4 | +9.9 #30 | -5.5 #90 | +6.5 #38 | +11.7 #28 | +1.7 #53 | +4.8 #32 | |
| 51 |  Virginia TechVT | 5-2 | +5.4 #48 | -2.3 #53 | +3.0 #54 | +6.6 #47 | +3.8 #41 | -0.8 #74 | |
| 52 |  North TexasUNT | 4-2 | +3.7 #54 | -1.3 #44 | +6.5 #36 | +2.1 #59 | +10.0 #9 | -3.5 #104 | |
| 53 |  MemphisMEM | 5-2 | +3.3 #56 | -2.3 #54 | +3.9 #50 | +3.0 #57 | +4.4 #36 | -0.5 #71 | |
| 54 |  Iowa StateISU | 3-3 | +3.6 #55 | -2.8 #63 | +2.4 #56 | +4.3 #54 | +0.2 #67 | +2.1 #48 | |
| 55 |  UTSAUTSA | 6-1 | -1.1 #73 | +1.7 #29 | +0.5 #64 | -1.9 #77 | +2.1 #52 | -1.6 #82 | |
| 56 | WashingtonWASH | 4-3 | +4.2 #51 | -3.8 #74 | +3.2 #53 | +4.7 #52 | +1.1 #62 | +2.1 #49 | |
| 57 |  LibertyLIB | 5-1 | +1.1 #61 | -0.7 #39 | +1.7 #59 | +0.7 #64 | -1.5 #78 | +3.2 #42 | |
| 58 | PurduePUR | 3-4 | +1.2 #59 | -4.1 #78 | -0.0 #65 | +1.9 #60 | +3.9 #39 | -4.0 #109 | beat ILL |
| 59 | IllinoisILL | 3-3 | +4.0 #53 | -3.7 #73 | +3.3 #52 | +4.4 #53 | +4.5 #35 | -1.2 #78 | |
| 60 |  VirginiaUVA | 4-3 | +4.1 #52 | -4.1 #79 | +1.3 #61 | +5.6 #50 | -1.9 #82 | +3.2 #41 | |
| 61 |  N Dakota StNDSU | 6-1 | +0.6 #64 | -0.8 #40 | +2.2 #57 | -0.2 #71 | -2.8 #91 | +5.0 #29 | |
| 62 |  ArkansasARK | 3-4 | +0.9 #62 | -2.9 #65 | -1.6 #75 | +2.2 #58 | -2.8 #90 | +1.2 #57 | |
| 63 | MinnesotaMINN | 4-2 | -0.8 #71 | -1.6 #48 | -2.0 #80 | -0.2 #72 | -2.1 #85 | +0.2 #66 | |
| 64 |  VanderbiltVAN | 3-4 | +0.1 #66 | -4.6 #83 | -0.8 #68 | +0.5 #66 | -0.4 #73 | -0.3 #70 | beat NCSU |
| 65 |  NC StateNCSU | 3-3 | +0.0 #67 | -2.7 #61 | -2.0 #79 | +1.1 #62 | +1.1 #60 | -3.1 #100 | |
| 66 |  Arizona StASU | 3-3 | -1.7 #79 | -3.0 #67 | -2.4 #83 | -1.3 #75 | +3.4 #44 | -5.7 #120 | beat KU |
| 67 |  KansasKU | 2-4 | +3.0 #57 | -6.5 #99 | +1.7 #58 | +3.7 #55 | +1.5 #56 | +0.3 #65 | |
| 68 |  Air ForceAFA | 5-1 | -2.5 #81 | -1.0 #42 | -3.1 #88 | -2.1 #79 | -1.5 #79 | -1.6 #81 | |
| 69 |  Texas StTXST | 3-3 | +1.2 #60 | -4.7 #85 | +3.6 #51 | -0.1 #70 | +7.0 #17 | -3.4 #102 | |
| 70 |  ColoradoCOLO | 2-4 | +0.4 #65 | -4.3 #82 | -0.8 #69 | +1.0 #63 | -3.3 #98 | +2.6 #45 | |
| 71 |  Louisiana TechLT | 4-2 | -3.1 #83 | -1.0 #41 | -2.0 #81 | -3.7 #87 | -0.1 #70 | -1.9 #86 | beat UL |
| 72 |  LouisianaUL | 5-2 | -1.3 #77 | -2.6 #59 | -0.5 #66 | -1.8 #76 | -2.1 #84 | +1.6 #55 | |
| 73 |  South FloridaUSF | 5-2 | -1.2 #75 | -3.6 #71 | +0.6 #63 | -2.2 #80 | -3.0 #94 | +3.6 #39 | beat ARMY |
| 74 |  ArmyARMY | 4-2 | -0.5 #69 | -3.7 #72 | -1.3 #73 | -0.0 #69 | +0.5 #65 | -1.8 #84 | |
| 75 |  W MichiganWMU | 5-2 | -2.5 #82 | -2.4 #56 | -2.4 #84 | -2.5 #81 | -4.1 #103 | +1.8 #54 | |
| 76 |  West VirginiaWVU | 4-3 | -1.3 #76 | -3.8 #75 | -4.5 #92 | +0.4 #67 | +5.0 #33 | -9.5 #130 | |
| 77 |  TulaneTULN | 3-3 | -1.1 #74 | -4.3 #81 | -1.0 #71 | -1.2 #74 | -5.9 #113 | +4.9 #31 | |
| 78 |  Fresno StFRES | 4-3 | -0.8 #72 | -4.7 #84 | -1.1 #72 | -0.7 #73 | -1.9 #83 | +0.8 #61 | |
| 79 | Michigan StMSU | 2-5 | +0.8 #63 | -6.7 #100 | -1.0 #70 | +1.7 #61 | -3.0 #95 | +2.0 #50 | beat TOL |
| 80 |  ToledoTOL | 5-2 | -1.7 #78 | -4.1 #77 | +1.6 #60 | -3.4 #84 | +3.8 #40 | -2.3 #90 | |
| 81 |  Georgia StGAST | 4-2 | -4.4 #91 | -2.6 #58 | -1.6 #76 | -5.9 #92 | +2.9 #48 | -4.6 #115 | |
| 82 |  Georgia TechGT | 2-4 | -0.0 #68 | -7.1 #110 | -0.7 #67 | +0.3 #68 | +0.4 #66 | -1.0 #76 | |
| 83 |  UNLVUNLV | 4-3 | -2.1 #80 | -5.1 #86 | -2.0 #82 | -2.1 #78 | -2.9 #92 | +0.8 #60 | |
| 84 |  Boston CollegeBC | 3-3 | -3.3 #84 | -4.1 #80 | -4.5 #93 | -2.6 #82 | -7.0 #116 | +2.4 #46 | |
| 85 |  CaliforniaCAL | 3-4 | -4.6 #93 | -6.1 #97 | -6.0 #97 | -3.9 #88 | -3.2 #97 | -2.8 #96 | beat SYR |
| 86 |  SyracuseSYR | 2-4 | -0.7 #70 | -7.0 #105 | -2.9 #87 | +0.5 #65 | -0.3 #72 | -2.6 #92 | |
| 87 |  South AlabamaUSA | 4-2 | -7.1 #96 | -2.6 #60 | -7.6 #103 | -6.8 #94 | +4.2 #38 | -11.8 #136 | beat OHIO |
| 88 |  OhioOHIO | 5-2 | -5.8 #94 | -2.8 #64 | -3.4 #89 | -7.1 #95 | -1.8 #80 | -1.5 #80 | |
| 89 |  TulsaTLSA | 4-3 | -3.7 #87 | -5.2 #88 | -3.7 #90 | -3.7 #86 | -2.5 #87 | -1.2 #79 | |
| 90 |  App StateAPP | 4-2 | -8.2 #101 | -4.0 #76 | -6.8 #99 | -8.9 #101 | -3.7 #100 | -3.1 #99 | beat ECU |
| 91 |  East CarolinaECU | 3-3 | -4.3 #90 | -5.5 #92 | -2.7 #85 | -5.2 #90 | -2.6 #88 | -0.1 #67 | |
| 92 |  Jax StateJXST | 5-2 | -6.8 #95 | -3.4 #70 | -4.1 #91 | -8.3 #97 | -1.2 #77 | -2.9 #97 | |
| 93 |  GA SouthernGASO | 3-4 | -3.6 #86 | -7.1 #109 | -1.7 #77 | -4.6 #89 | -2.4 #86 | +0.8 #62 | |
| 94 | RutgersRUTG | 2-4 | -4.1 #89 | -6.8 #103 | -6.0 #98 | -3.1 #83 | +1.2 #58 | -7.2 #125 | beat MD |
| 95 | MarylandMD | 2-5 | -3.3 #85 | -7.4 #111 | -2.8 #86 | -3.6 #85 | +1.1 #61 | -3.9 #106 | |
| 96 |  Miami OHM-OH | 4-3 | -8.4 #102 | -5.6 #93 | -5.7 #96 | -9.8 #106 | -3.0 #96 | -2.7 #93 | beat CONN |
| 97 |  UConnCONN | 3-3 | -4.5 #92 | -7.0 #108 | -1.7 #78 | -6.0 #93 | +1.5 #57 | -3.2 #101 | |
| 98 |  FAUFAU | 4-2 | -9.4 #107 | -2.6 #57 | -8.0 #107 | -10.1 #107 | +0.6 #64 | -8.7 #128 | |
| 99 |  StanfordSTAN | 3-4 | -10.0 #108 | -2.9 #66 | -7.3 #100 | -11.4 #108 | -2.9 #93 | -4.4 #114 | |
| 100 |  NavyNAVY | 2-4 | -4.1 #88 | -9.4 #121 | -1.4 #74 | -5.5 #91 | -0.7 #74 | -0.7 #73 | |
| 101 |  San Diego StSDSU | 3-4 | -7.6 #97 | -6.2 #98 | -5.4 #95 | -8.8 #100 | -2.6 #89 | -2.8 #95 | |
| 102 |  Utah StateUSU | 2-4 | -7.8 #99 | -6.7 #101 | -8.2 #108 | -7.6 #96 | -10.0 #133 | +1.8 #53 | |
| 103 |  FIUFIU | 3-3 | -7.7 #98 | -7.0 #107 | -5.0 #94 | -9.2 #103 | -9.5 #130 | +4.5 #35 | |
| 104 |  TroyTROY | 3-3 | -9.2 #106 | -5.7 #94 | -8.4 #109 | -9.6 #105 | -4.0 #102 | -4.4 #113 | |
| 105 |  Arkansas StARST | 3-4 | -8.2 #100 | -7.8 #114 | -7.5 #102 | -8.5 #99 | -3.5 #99 | -4.0 #110 | |
| 106 |  New Mexico StNMSU | 2-4 | -11.9 #113 | -8.6 #117 | -9.6 #114 | -13.2 #116 | -4.9 #106 | -4.7 #117 | beat WKU |
| 107 |  NevadaNEV | 2-4 | -8.5 #104 | -10.1 #122 | -8.8 #110 | -8.4 #98 | -5.1 #107 | -3.7 #105 | beat WKU |
| 108 |  Western KYWKU | 3-4 | -10.9 #110 | -5.8 #95 | -9.0 #111 | -11.9 #110 | -4.9 #105 | -4.1 #112 | |
| 109 |  UABUAB | 4-3 | -12.1 #114 | -5.2 #87 | -9.0 #112 | -13.8 #117 | -6.8 #115 | -2.2 #89 | |
| 110 |  San José StSJSU | 4-3 | -11.5 #111 | -5.8 #96 | -9.6 #113 | -12.5 #112 | -7.8 #122 | -1.8 #83 | |
| 111 |  BuffaloBUFF | 4-3 | -13.1 #120 | -5.5 #91 | -13.6 #125 | -12.9 #114 | -8.0 #123 | -5.6 #119 | |
| 112 |  Colorado StCSU | 2-4 | -12.4 #116 | -7.5 #112 | -12.2 #121 | -12.6 #113 | +3.0 #47 | -15.2 #138 | |
| 113 |  C MichiganCMU | 3-4 | -13.2 #121 | -6.9 #104 | -11.1 #118 | -14.3 #121 | -9.2 #127 | -1.9 #85 | |
| 114 |  TempleTEM | 2-5 | -8.8 #105 | -11.3 #126 | -7.7 #105 | -9.3 #104 | -3.8 #101 | -3.9 #107 | |
| 115 |  UMassMASS | 4-3 | -12.6 #117 | -7.6 #113 | -10.4 #115 | -13.8 #118 | -7.6 #121 | -2.7 #94 | |
| 116 |  Washington StWSU | 1-6 | -8.5 #103 | -11.9 #129 | -7.5 #101 | -9.0 #102 | -5.5 #110 | -2.0 #88 | |
| 117 |  MarshallMRSH | 3-3 | -15.6 #126 | -5.3 #89 | -13.9 #127 | -16.5 #126 | -5.7 #112 | -8.2 #126 | |
| 118 |  WyomingWYO | 4-3 | -14.6 #125 | -7.0 #106 | -13.2 #123 | -15.4 #125 | -11.2 #137 | -2.0 #87 | |
| 119 |  Missouri StMOST | 2-4 | -13.7 #122 | -8.0 #115 | -11.7 #120 | -14.7 #123 | -5.3 #109 | -6.4 #124 | beat KENN |
| 120 |  Kennesaw StKENN | 1-5 | -10.2 #109 | -11.5 #128 | -7.9 #106 | -11.4 #109 | -7.1 #117 | -0.8 #75 | |
| 121 |  DelawareDEL | 2-4 | -12.9 #119 | -9.0 #120 | -10.6 #116 | -14.1 #120 | -5.7 #111 | -5.0 #118 | |
| 122 |  Old DominionODU | 2-5 | -11.8 #112 | -10.9 #124 | -7.6 #104 | -14.0 #119 | -7.4 #119 | -0.2 #68 | |
| 123 |  MTSUMTSU | 3-3 | -16.6 #129 | -6.8 #102 | -13.4 #124 | -18.3 #130 | -7.5 #120 | -5.9 #122 | |
| 124 |  E MichiganEMU | 4-4 | -15.9 #128 | -8.5 #116 | -14.3 #129 | -16.7 #128 | -8.4 #125 | -5.9 #121 | |
| 125 |  CoastalCCU | 2-5 | -12.2 #115 | -12.5 #131 | -10.7 #117 | -13.1 #115 | -6.0 #114 | -4.6 #116 | |
| 126 |  Southern MissUSM | 1-5 | -14.0 #124 | -11.4 #127 | -12.8 #122 | -14.7 #122 | -4.3 #104 | -8.5 #127 | |
| 127 |  Sam HoustonSHSU | 1-5 | -15.8 #127 | -10.9 #125 | -14.0 #128 | -16.7 #127 | -9.9 #132 | -4.0 #111 | |
| 128 |  RiceRICE | 1-6 | -14.0 #123 | -12.6 #133 | -11.5 #119 | -15.4 #124 | -8.0 #124 | -3.4 #103 | |
| 129 |  Kent StateKENT | 2-5 | -19.6 #132 | -8.8 #118 | -14.5 #130 | -22.3 #135 | -10.6 #135 | -3.9 #108 | beat BALL |
| 130 |  Ball StateBALL | 2-5 | -19.1 #131 | -8.8 #119 | -15.4 #132 | -21.1 #132 | -5.2 #108 | -10.3 #133 | beat BGSU |
| 131 |  Bowling GreenBGSU | 2-5 | -16.9 #130 | -10.8 #123 | -15.3 #131 | -17.7 #129 | -9.3 #129 | -6.0 #123 | |
| 132 |  Hawai'iHAW | 1-6 | -12.8 #118 | -14.9 #136 | -13.8 #126 | -12.3 #111 | -10.9 #136 | -2.9 #98 | |
| 133 |  N IllinoisNIU | 0-6 | -19.9 #133 | -13.2 #134 | -19.6 #136 | -20.1 #131 | -10.5 #134 | -9.0 #129 | |
| 134 |  CharlotteCLT | 1-6 | -20.5 #134 | -12.6 #132 | -18.0 #133 | -21.9 #133 | -7.3 #118 | -10.7 #135 | |
| 135 |  UTEPUTEP | 1-6 | -22.3 #136 | -12.0 #130 | -18.5 #134 | -24.4 #136 | -8.4 #126 | -10.0 #132 | |
| 136 |  AkronAKR | 1-6 | -21.0 #135 | -13.9 #135 | -19.1 #135 | -22.1 #134 | -9.2 #128 | -9.9 #131 | |
| 137 |  UL MonroeULM | 0-6 | -24.9 #137 | -15.1 #137 | -22.4 #137 | -26.3 #137 | -9.8 #131 | -12.6 #137 | |
| 138 |  Sacramento StSAC | 1-6 | -29.1 #138 | -15.7 #138 | -22.9 #138 | -32.4 #138 | -12.2 #138 | -10.7 #134 |
Rk = B1G+A ranking (B1G+A rating + résumé + head-to-head; see below). B1G+A rating = 65% FPI (comparison) + 35% B1G+A Power Rating this week, in points vs. an average FBS team on a neutral field. Power rtg = the pure B1G+A Power Rating (results and efficiency only). Off/Def split the Power rating (higher is better for both). Résumé = 3 points per win above what a Top 25-level team would expect against the same schedule + 1 point per win over a B1G+A top-25 team (rank among all FBS teams). H2H = moved ahead of the listed team(s) by the head-to-head rule. Records count every completed game, including FCS opponents.
* B1G+A Model 2.2 (blended with FPI (comparison)), updated Oct 12, 2026. Model notes · Version history
HOW THE B1G+A RATINGS WORK
What the number means. A rating of +14.0 means the B1G+A model expects that team to beat an average FBS team by about 14 points on a neutral field. The gap between two teams is the expected margin between them; the home team gets a home-field edge fit from the data (currently 3.7 points).
What goes in
- Every 2026 game involving an FBS team (scores, home/away/neutral site, and box-score yards and plays), pulled from the public feed's public scoreboard and game summaries. FCS opponents share one generic, heavily shrunk FCS rating (currently -26.2).
- Scoring margin, opponent-adjusted. A ridge regression finds the set of team ratings that best explains every margin, given who played whom and where. Margins are capped at 28 points so running up the score does not help.
- Yards per play, opponent-adjusted. The same regression on each game's yards-per-play margin, converted to points. It counts for 20% of the rating; scoring margin is the other 80%. Yards per play is steadier than the scoreboard early in a season.
- A preseason prior that fades. Each team starts from its 2025 final B1G+A rating (computed the same way from 2025 games), pulled 15% of the way back toward average. The prior counts about like 1 game(s) of evidence, so it matters in September and is mostly gone by midseason. Returning-production data is not used (no free source), and FPI (comparison) is never an input.
- Offense/defense split comes from a matching regression on points scored and allowed, scaled so Off + Def = the rating.
The model is refit from scratch after every game day by the site's build script (it takes under a minute). Settings were tuned on the 2024 season only, then frozen and tested on 2025.
How it did: out-of-sample backtest
Each week of 2025 was projected using only games played before that week (the 2025 prior came from 2024). Straight-up = picked the right winner; MAE = average miss on the final margin, in points (lower is better); Brier = accuracy of the win probability (lower is better; 0.25 is a coin flip). Win probability = 1/(1+e−gap/9.25), where gap = rating difference plus home field.
| 2025, FBS vs FBS | Games | Straight-up | Margin MAE | Brier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1G+A | 808 | 72.4% | 12.42 | 0.180 |
| Naive (home +2.5) | 808 | 58.8% | 16.00 | 0.242 |
| B1G+A (FPI subset) | 807 | 72.4% | 12.41 | 0.180 |
| FPI (comparison) | 807 | 72.2% | 12.27 | 0.178 |
| B1G+A (Vegas subset) | 101 | 63.4% | 12.17 | 0.198 |
| Vegas spread | 101 | 70.3% | 11.38 | 0.181 |
2024 (the tuning season, so not fully out of sample):
| 2024, FBS vs FBS | Games | Straight-up | Margin MAE | Brier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1G+A | 798 | 69.8% | 12.82 | 0.191 |
| Naive (home +2.5) | 798 | 58.6% | 15.74 | 0.242 |
| B1G+A (FPI subset) | 797 | 69.8% | 12.83 | 0.191 |
| FPI (comparison) | 797 | 70.8% | 12.37 | 0.187 |
Honest read: the B1G+A rating is far better than a naive home-team baseline and close to FPI (comparison), but FPI is still slightly better on margin error and Brier, and the Vegas spread is better than both on the games where public feeds archived a line. FPI (comparison) figures come from the FPI (comparison) Matchup Predictor; Vegas lines from the public feed's archived odds (only 101 2025 games had one).
Rating vs. ranking, and the head-to-head rule
The ratings are forward-looking: who would win next week. The ranking (the Rk column) also rewards what a team has done. Ranking score = B1G+A rating (the blend) + 3 points for each win above what an average Top 25-level team would expect against the same schedule (a strength-of-record measure computed from B1G+A ratings) + 1 point per win over a team in the B1G+A rating top 25. Then the head-to-head rule: if Team A beat Team B this season, A is placed directly ahead of B when the two are close: B's B1G+A rating is at most 7 points higher and A's ranking score trails B's by at most 4. Head-to-head weighs heavily between close teams but is never an absolute override. If two teams split games, or wins form a loop of any length (A beat B, B beat C, C beat A), those results are ignored for this rule and the ranking score decides. The B1G+A Top 25 uses its own head-to-head window (see CFB Top 25). Teams moved by this rule are marked H2H.
B1G+A vs. FPI (comparison)
FPI is the public feed's own model; its inputs and weights are not public, and it uses information the B1G+A rating does not (such as recruiting and returning starters). The B1G+A rating uses only game results and box-score efficiency, so every number can be traced to games on the field. Expect B1G+A ratings to be a bit more compressed than FPI's (fewer extreme values) because of the margin cap and the shrinkage.
The B1G+A rating: blending in FPI (comparison)
The B1G+A Power Rating alone was slightly less accurate than FPI (comparison) in testing, especially early in the season, and blends of the two did as well as or better than either one. So the number used across the site, the B1G+A rating, is a weighted average: 65% FPI (comparison) and 35% B1G+A Power Rating this week. The FPI weight is 85% through Week 4 and drops 5 points a week to a floor of 50% from Week 11 on: in testing FPI helped most in September, and the two were about even later. The weights also keep the site's numbers from jumping away from figures already published.
| Week-by-week test | Games | Straight-up | Margin MAE | Brier | Log loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024: B1G+A Power Rating (pure) | 797 | 69.8% | 12.83 | 0.1909 | 0.5601 |
| 2024: FPI (comparison) (public feeds win %) | 797 | 70.8% | 12.37 | 0.1874 | 0.5485 |
| 2024: B1G+A blend (weekly FPI weight) | 797 | 71.1% | 12.39 | 0.1864 | 0.5473 |
| 2024: Fixed 50/50 blend | 797 | 70.6% | 12.49 | 0.1872 | 0.5499 |
| 2025: B1G+A Power Rating (pure) | 807 | 72.4% | 12.41 | 0.1802 | 0.5322 |
| 2025: FPI (comparison) (public feeds win %) | 807 | 72.2% | 12.27 | 0.1778 | 0.5259 |
| 2025: B1G+A blend (weekly FPI weight) | 807 | 72.0% | 12.19 | 0.1788 | 0.5299 |
| 2025: Fixed 50/50 blend | 807 | 72.4% | 12.22 | 0.1781 | 0.5280 |
Each 2024 and 2025 FBS-vs-FBS game, projected using only earlier games. FPI (comparison) uses the public feed's own pregame win % and projected margin. The weekly schedule was set by judgment from these tests; 2024 was also the season used to tune the Power Rating, so it is not fully out of sample.
Where B1G+A numbers are used
- CFP Live Projection: game win chances in the 40,000-run season sim come from the B1G+A rating. The starting playoff % blends FPI (comparison)'s playoff % with the sim's, using the same weekly weight, and then moves live as games finish.
- Projected records use the same game win chances.
- B1G+A Top 25: 50% public feeds Strength of Record rank, 30% B1G+A rating rank, 20% loss rank, minus a bonus for wins over AP Top 25 teams, then the head-to-head rule.
- Bowl Projections (coming soon) will use the same rating and sim.
- FPI (comparison) also appears on its own as a comparison column.
Model updates
- Oct 12: UCLA adjusted for QB Nico Iamaleava injury (out for the season; B1G+A rating -3 points while Ty Dieffenbach starts).
- B1G+A Model 2.2 · Oct 12, 2026, 11:45 PM CT (current). Current version: 2.1 plus a three-row live ticker on the homepage and /live, building on the live in-game tracking from 2.0 and 2.1. Row 1 is B1G games, row 2 is the Top 25 scrolling the opposite way, and row 3 is every CFB game, with a slower scroll. Each game shows the B1G+A win chance, with the projected loser's percentage in red beside it. Same FPI/B1G+A Power Rating blend schedule.
- B1G+A Model 2.1 · Oct 12, 2026. 2.0 plus updates since, including news-driven rating adjustments.
- B1G+A Model 2.0 · Week 7 upgrade. The big jump: 100% live in-game metrics for every FBS game (win chance on every play, 4th-down decisions graded live) plus the start of B1G+A's own data repository, collected from Week 6 after the Friday game (Iowa at Washington, Oct 9). Same FPI (comparison) / B1G+A Power Rating blend as 1.1.
- B1G+A v1.1 · Oct 10, 2026, 11:29 PM CT. B1G+A v1.1 blends the B1G+A Power Rating with FPI (comparison). It tested best for accuracy in combined 2024-2025 backtests (highest share of winners picked correctly). Some projections differ slightly from numbers published earlier. Example: Nebraska pregame playoff odds: 27.1% published vs 25.3% under v1.1.
- B1G+A v1.0 · Oct 9, 2026. Launch version (FPI (comparison)-led). Reports published before Oct 10, 2026, 11:29 PM CT keep their original v1.0 numbers.